Targeted Callers

Generated on 2026-05-07

Targeted Callers

Repetitive regions in the human genome pose a challenge for general variant calling approaches which typically cannot make use of potentially misplaced MAPQ0 reads. Furthermore, high sequence homology of some genes with a pseudogene paralog can lead to a wide variety of common structural variants (SVs) in the population, requiring specialized targeted calling approaches. DRAGEN supports targeted calling for a number of genes/targets as described in subsequent target-specific sections. For more information, refer to the DRAGEN user guide.

DRAGEN: DRAGEN 4.5.4 | Assay: WGS

Performance summary

Targeted caller concordance summary (WGS)

Target
Concordant
Total
Concordance

CYP2D6

211

212

99.5%

SMN1

247

250

98.8%

SMN2

244

250

97.6%

GBA

24

24

100.0%

CYP2B6 (GeT-RM)

70

76

92.1%

CYP2B6 (PacBio HiFi)

123

125

98.4%

CYP21A2

82

84

97.6%

HBA1/2

244

247

98.8%

RHD/RHCE

41

42

97.6%

CYP2D6

Concordant across 211 out of 212 (99.5%) WGS samples with calls from GeT-RM and long read sequencing data.

CYP2D6 concordance by star allele type

Star Allele Type
Number of Samples
Concordance

without SV

90

89 (98.9%)

deletion

15

15 (100%)

duplication

12

12 (100%)

fusion/conversion

26

26 (100%)

Total

143

142 (99.3%)

References: DRAGEN Product Guide | Cyrius: accurate CYP2D6 genotyping using WGS data

SMN1/2

Concordant across 247/250 (98.8%) WGS samples for SMN1 and 244/250 (97.6%) WGS samples for SMN2, compared against digital PCR and MLPA.

SMN1 concordance by copy number

SMN1 CN
Total Samples
Concordant

0

42

42 (100%)

1

23

23 (100%)

2

96

94 (97.9%)

3

68

68 (100%)

4

20

20 (100%)

6

1

0 (0%)

Total

250

247 (98.8%)

SMN2 concordance by copy number

SMN2 CN
Total Samples
Concordant

0

26

26 (100%)

1

73

71 (97.3%)

2

92

89 (96.7%)

3

54

54 (100%)

4

5

4 (80%)

Total

250

244 (97.6%)

References: DRAGEN Product Guide | SMA carrier screening from WGS data

GBA

Concordant across 24/24 (100%) WGS samples compared against digital PCR and long read sequencing data.

GBA concordance by variant type

Copy Number Change
Recombinant Variant
Total Samples
Concordant

Gain

None

10

10 (100%)

Loss

None

2

2 (100%)

Loss

RecNciI

1

1 (100%)

Loss

A495P

1

1 (100%)

Neutral

L483P

7

7 (100%)

Neutral

c.1263del

1

1 (100%)

Neutral

c.1263del+RecTL

2

2 (100%)

Total

24

24 (100%)

References: DRAGEN Product Guide | GBA gene for Gaucher and Parkinson disease research

CYP2B6

Concordance against calls from GeT-RM and long read sequencing data. Concordance is based on metabolizer status when multiple genotypes are reported. Two discordant samples in the PacBio comparison are due to a novel star allele (*U1) resulting in multiple possible genotypes.

CYP2B6 concordance by reference source

Star Allele Genotype Source
Number of Samples
DRAGEN Concordance

GeT-RM

76

70 (92.1%)

PacBio HiFi reads

125

123 (98.4%)

References: DRAGEN Product Guide

CYP21A2

Concordant across 82/84 (97.6%) WGS samples across three benchmark sets with calls from long-range PCR, MLPA and long read sequencing.

CYP21A2 concordance by benchmark set

Benchmark Set
Total Samples
Concordant

Internal

14

13 (92.9%)

1KGP

66

65 (98.5%)

Coriell

4

4 (100%)

Total

84

82 (97.6%)

References: DRAGEN Product Guide | CYP21A2 blog

HBA1/2

Concordant across 244/247 (98.8%) WGS samples compared against long read sequencing data.

HBA1/2 WGS concordance by genotype

HBA Genotype
Total Samples
Concordant

aa/aa

202

199 (98.5%)

-α3.7/aa

31

31 (100%)

--/aa

4

4 (100%)

-α3.7/-α3.7

4

4 (100%)

αααα3.7/aa

3

3 (100%)

-α4.2/aa

2

2 (100%)

αααα4.2/aa

1

1 (100%)

Total

247

244 (98.8%)

References: DRAGEN Product Guide | HBA targeted caller

LPA

LPA copy number is assessed via allele-specific KIV-2 repeat quantification. Accuracy was evaluated by trio/duo-based inheritance analysis and comparison against Bionano optical mapping.

LPA benchmark: KIV-2 copy number concordance with Bionano and trio inheritance analysis

Figure: (A) Trio-based phased KIV-2 copy number comparison in 120 offspring vs best-matching parental call. (B) Duo-based comparison in 153 offspring. (C) Total copy number vs Bionano optical mapping (n=145). (D) Allelic copy number vs Bionano optical mapping (n=145). Pearson's r and P-value shown per panel.

References: DRAGEN Product Guide | KIV-2 copy number variants for cardiovascular disease risk

RHD/RHCE

Concordant across 41/42 (97.6%) WGS samples compared against long read sequencing data.

RHD/RHCE concordance by gene conversion status

RHCE*CE-D(2)-CE Gene Conversion
Total Samples
Concordant

Not present

24

24 (100%)

Heterozygous

10

9 (90%)

Homozygous

8

8 (100%)

Total

42

41 (97.6%)

References: DRAGEN Product Guide

Star Allele Caller

The Star Allele Caller identifies the genotypes and metabolism status of the following PGx genes that are included in FDA's PGx recommendations or have CPIC Level A designation: CACNA1S, CFTR, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP4F2, IFNL3, RYR1, NUDT15, SLCO1B1, TPMT, UGT1A1, VKORC1, DPYD, G6PD, MT-RNR1, BCHE, ABCG2, NAT2, F5 and UGT2B17. For more information, refer to the DRAGEN user guide.

Sample source
# samples
Compare against
Genes tested
Concordance*

1K genomes project

3201

PharmCAT (from DRAGEN gVCF)

DPYD, CACNA1S, UGT1A1, TPMT, CYP3A5, CFTR, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, SLCO1B1, NUDT15, VKORC1, CYP4F2, RYR1, IFNL3

100%

Coriell

96

PharmCAT (from DRAGEN gVCF)

DPYD, CACNA1S, UGT1A1, TPMT, CYP3A5, CFTR, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, SLCO1B1, NUDT15, VKORC1, CYP4F2, RYR1, IFNL3

100%

Coriell

96

GeT-RM (using orthogonal methods)

CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, CYP4F2, TPMT

94%*

1K genomes project

100

Aldy (from BWA/GATK BAM)

G6PD, CFTR, IFNL3, TPMT, VKORC1

100%

* Truth set from 2016; 6% calls from outdated star allele definition.

Last updated

Was this helpful?